![free rss reader google play free rss reader google play](https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/play-movies-tv.jpg)
![free rss reader google play free rss reader google play](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6fdcf5207df58d453e20220799a59015-1200-80.jpeg)
HTML already supports audio and video, and it is trivial for Google to enable content distributed through podcasts to play on the browser platform. YouTube Music is poor substitute for the discontinued Google Music, but a feed-based music subscription service through Chrome may be more satisfying and would be a much more effective marketing vehicle for live events and specialized subscription content. It also allows Google to respond to Spotify and Apple by enabling users to listen to podcasts though the same Chrome interface. This was a service FeedBurner also used to provide, but Google has discontinued Feedburner email subscriptions. Services like Patreon and Substack are enabling content producers to stay outside social networks and directly reach (and monetize) readers. I think this is Google's response to another form of open and decentralized content distribution: paid email newsletters. The browser essentially provides the centralization needed to make RSS commercially viable. Google wants to add 'private feeds' that require subscription fees. Most users are logged in (and therefore tracked) while they are using Chrome. Google's recent interest in RSS, where they are experimenting with a feed reader bundled into Chrome, has the same objective.
Free rss reader google play free#
Like Apple has been doing for years, Spotify wants to create a market for fee-based subscription content, which it can only create by making it harder to access free and open content, and building user tracking and content promotion. However, over the last year or so, Spotify has been buying out most of the popular podcast listening applications (known as 'podcatchers') and converting then to a centralized user-login model. These, like RSS, are openly accessible and decentralized. We're seeing the same trend play out, years later, with podcasts. Similarly, that's why you still can't get RSS feeds from Twitter without an adapter (like RSS.app) or at all from Facebook platforms. It also discontinued RSS on YouTube (it was very quietly restored a couple of years ago). That's why, for example, when Google was trying to build the audience for Google+, it discontinued its RSS reader. But they lose this advantage if they support RSS. Centralized social networks work much better for user tracking and link promotion. RSS was essentially disappeared because there wasn't a good business model for commercialization.